Question: It could be argued that Sidhartha was in the position similar to Oedipus, and Sidharthas father, the King, was in a position similar to King Laius — but after that, both Sidhartha and his father responded to their situations very differently it could be said oppositely to what Oedipus and Laius did.
Indeed, one scholar observed, I could respect the thinking of Sidharthas father, except for the fact that his son was Sidhartha, who was destined to grow up to be the Buddha. So, in that case, of course it was necessary for Sidhartha to disobey his father, for the good of the whole world.
Could you explain what this scholar is talking about, and do you agree with this scholars view?
DON’T FORGET TO GRAB YOUR FREE TRIAL FOR THE BEST AUTOMATED MARKETING STRATEGY HERE! (OVER 1,000,000 LEADS GENERATED MONTHLY)